Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the change-wp-admin-login domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u168781334/domains/cashmycurrency.com/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6260
LHC summons ECP over disqualification petitions | The Express Tribune – Cash My Currency- Financial Updates | Business Blog Post | Financial Guest Posting Services

LHC summons ECP over disqualification petitions | The Express Tribune

LHC summons ECP over disqualification petitions | The Express Tribune

LAHORE:

The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Wednesday summoned the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) over petitions challenging the issuance of disqualification notifications following convictions.

According to Express News, Justice Khalid Ishaq heard the petitions filed by Muhammad Ahmad Chattha and Muhammad Ahmad Khan Bachhar, represented by Advocate Shehzad Shaukat.

Last month, both Chattha and Bachhar were convicted in a case related to the May 9 riots, and subsequently disqualified by the election supervisor.

During the proceedings on Wednesday, Advocate Arshad Nazir Mirza appeared on behalf of provincial assembly member Afzal Sahi.

Advocate Shaukat argued that the ECP issued the disqualification notification without hearing the respondents, whereas under Article 63-A of the Constitution, a decision on disqualification can only be made after hearing the candidate.

He maintained that the court had convicted them, but the speaker of the assembly neither received a reference nor forwarded one to the ECP.

He pointed out that the court’s decision was announced on July 31, yet the disqualification was notified on August 5. “Will an anti-terrorism court verdict now be treated like a Supreme Court judgment?” he asked.

The court inquired whether the petitioners would remain provincial assembly members if their sentences were suspended, to which the lawyer replied in the affirmative.

Scroll to Top